- Visibility 2 Views
- Downloads 1 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.achr.2021.042
-
CrossMark
Histopathological evaluation of Endometrium hyperplasia and it’s correlation with the clinical parameters in a tertiary care hospital
Introduction
Endometrium biopsies & hysterectomies specimen for any abnormal bleeding are commonly received in the department of pathology. Their diagnosis made on the light microscopy is quite helpful in planning the treatment for the patient since in most of the patients who are having endometrial hyperplasia with atypia are prone to develop endometrial carcinoma.
Endometrium is constantly engaged in the dynamics of shedding & regrowth during active reproductive life, it is controlled by rise & fall of pituitary hormones .Alterations in the fine tuning mechanism may result in a spectrum of disturbances & endometrial hyperplasia is most important among them. Arising Endometrial hyperplasia often preceeds the development of endometrial carcinoma. More recently, studies have found that the risk of endometrial hyperplasia is associated with increasing body mass index & nulliparity.[1] In addition to this increasing obesity, anovulatory cycles & exogenous hormones are associated with endometrial & endometrial carcinoma both. The role of unopposed estrogen has been supported by many studies since high levels of estrogen has been found in the patients with endometrial carcinoma.[2], [3]
Endometrial hyperplasia is defined as a proliferation of glands of irregular size & shape with an associated increase in gland to stroma ratio compared with proliferative endometrium. The process is generally diffuse but it may be focal also. The WHO classification, presently the most widely used, is a four –tier classification system takes into the account both cytologic & architectural abnormalities.[4]
In the past the terms “adenomatous hyperplasia “ & “atypical hyperplasia “were used to denote proliferative lesions of the endometrium with varying degrees of architectural complexity & cytological atypia[5], [6], [7], [8], [9] in addition, the term “carcinoma in situ” was proposed to describe small lesions, with or without glandular crowding, having the cytologic features of carcinoma but lacking invasion.[7], [9], [10] We used WHO Classification in our study. In addition, a more recent epidemiologic study added further support for this simplified classification by showing that the only lesions that significantly increased the relative risk of carcinoma with atypical hyperplasia.[11]
WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia
Hyperplasia without atypia, Simple hyperplasia without atypia, Complex hyperplasia without atypia.
Atypical hyperplasia, Simple (atypical hyperplasia), Complex atypical hyperplasia.
Patients with endometrial hyperplasia typically have abnormal bleeding. Occasionally the lesion is detected by endometrial biopsy performed during the course of infertility workup or before the start of hormonal therapy in post menopausal females. Hyperplasia usually appears as a result of unopposed estrogen use. And so most patients have a history of either persistent anovulation or exogenous unopposed estrogen usage. Though anovulation occurs at menarche & perimenopausal women, hyperplasia is not usually found in young women.
Aims & Objectives
To study the Histopathological patterns of endometrial hyperplasia.
To correlate endometrial hyperplasia with clinical parameters.
Materials and Methods
This is a hospital based study done in the department of pathology at a tertiary care hospital.
Study was conducted on 125 cases of endometrial hyperplasia which were re-evaluated and their relevant clinical details like menstrual history including age of menarche, date of last menstrual period, number of children, any history of abortions, age of menopause if occurred, any history of taking HRT and were recorded. Histological typing of endometrial hyperplasia by re-evaluating them under light microscopy & typing was done depending on the criteria used in WHO classification.
Results
|
S. No. |
Histopathology |
No. of cases |
% |
|
1. |
Endometrial hyperplasia |
53 |
42.4 |
|
2. |
Proliferative phase |
21 |
16.8 |
|
3. |
Secretory phase |
26 |
20.8 |
|
4. |
Hormonal effects |
12 |
9.6 |
|
5. |
Atrophic endometrium |
09 |
7.2 |
|
6. |
Irregular shedding with endometritis |
04 |
3.2 |
|
Total |
|
125 |
100 |
|
S. No. |
Type of hyperplasia |
No. of cases |
% |
|
1. |
Simple hyperplasia |
24 |
45.2 |
|
2. |
Complex hyperplasia |
06 |
11.3 |
|
3. |
Simple hyperplasia with atypia |
14 |
26.4 |
|
4. |
Complex hyperplasia with atypia |
09 |
17 |
|
Total |
|
53 |
100 |
|
S. No. |
Age of the patient |
Total |
% |
|
1. |
21-30yrs |
02 |
4% |
|
2. |
31-40yrs |
22 |
42% |
|
3. |
41-50yrs |
21 |
39% |
|
4. |
> 50yrs |
08 |
15% |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
S. No. |
Clinical complains |
No. of cases with Endometrial Hyperplasia |
% |
|
1 |
Menorrhagia |
88 |
70 |
|
2 |
Post menopausal bleed |
17 |
14 |
|
3 |
Continuous bleed |
18 |
15 |
|
4. |
Others |
02 |
1 |
Discussion
Endometrial hyperplasia is the most common gynaecological disorder, it is due to unopposed estrogen stimulation. Endometrial assessment is performed to diagnose malignant & premalignant conditions & to evaluate the hormonal influences on the endometrium. In this study a total of 125 cases were assessed.
In our study 53 cases presented with endometrial hyperplasia followed by secretory phase, then proliferative phase, 9cases presented with atrophic endometrium & four of them had irregular shedding with endometritis.
Out of 53 patients 24 (45%) patients presented with simple hyperplasia, 14 patients had simple hyperplasia without atypia, 9 presented with complex hyperplasia without atypia followed by 6 patients having complex hyperplasia without atypia.
The peak incidence of endometrial hyperplasia was noted in 3rd and 4th decade followed by 5th decade with only 2 patients lying in the age group of 21 to 30 years.
Gusberg & Kaplan [12] in their study (1963) of 191 cases the peak incidence of endometrial hyperplasia was noted in 4th decade followed by 5th decade.
The most common clinical complain in our study was menorrhagia followed by continuous bleeding, post menopausal bleeding in 17 patients our results were in concordance with the studies of Takreem et al.
Takreem et al [13] also found out that menorrhagia is the commonest complain in endometrial hyperplasia (53.3%) which is in concordance with our study that is 66.6%.
Conclusion
It is very important to know the histopathological pattern of endometrium especially the hyperplasia going in them and their correlation with clinical parameters .Since early and proper recognition of these conditions helps in the proper management, treatment avoid landing up of the patients into further complications.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this paper.
Source of Funding
None.
References
- M Epplein, SD Reed, LF Voigt, KM Newton, VL Holt, NS Weiss. Risk of complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in relation to antrhropometric measures and reproductive history. Am J E pidemiol 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- LA Brinton, ML Berman, R Mortel, LB Twiggs, RJ Barrett, GD Wilbanks. Reproductive, menstrual, and medical risk factors for endometrial cancer : results from a case -control study. Am J Obstect Gynecol 1992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- N Potischman, RN Hoover, LA Brinton, P Siiteri, JF Dorgan, CA Swanson. Case -control study of endogenous steroid hormones and endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- ASY Leung, S Vinyuvat, FJWM Leong. Anti-CD38 and VS38 antibodies for detection of plasma cells in the diagnosis of chronic endometritis. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 1977. [Google Scholar]
- L A Brinton, R N Hoover. Endometrial Cancer Collaborative Group (1993) Estrogen replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol . [Google Scholar]
- HO Critchley, S Tong, ST Cameron, TA Drudy, RW Kelly, DT Baird. Regulation of bcl-2 gene family members in human endometrium by antiprogestin administration in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- B Disep, B A Innes, H R Cochrane. Immunohistochemical characterization of endometrial leucocytes in endometritis. Histopathology 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- R H Kaufman, G L Binder, P N Gray. Upper genital tract changes associated with exposure in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- M Mckenna, W G Mccluggage. Signet ring cells of stromal derivation in the uterine cervix secondary to cauterization: report of a previously undescribed phenomenon. J Clin Pathol 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- WG Mccluggage, E Oliva, CS Herrington. CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma. Histopathology 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- D Grady, T Gebrestsadik, K Kerlikowske. Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynaecol 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- SB Gusberg, AL Kaplan. Precursors of Corpus Cancer .IV. Adenomatous Hyperplasia as Stage O Carcinoma of the Endometrium. Am J 1963. [Google Scholar]
- A Takreem, N Danish, S Razaq. incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in 100 cases presenting with polymenorrhagia/menorrhagia in perimenopausal women. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008. [Google Scholar]